The Physical Traits of Race

by Farzana on Septembre 14, 2016 - 4:39pm

We tend to believe that we can classify individuals into certain categories based on their “race”. After taking this anthropology class I realised that we, human, do not know much about “race”. In this essay I will provide reasons on why my view on the concept of race started to change. 

First of all, I thought that the concept of “race” is a social construct in order to classify individuals depending on their skin color or other physical traits that might belong to a specific group of peopleWe learned in class that in fact “race” is relatedto physical appearance, but it does not necessarily define it. Wealso learned that we cannot classify someone by just looking at him/her and that their race has nothing to do with their biological traits so we should not associate someone to a race by simply using physical traits and most commonly their skin color. In the Diamond’s article, we had to read for this class, the author specifies that in fact physical traits can be impacted by the environment in which one is living. Body shapes can differ from one place to another, “Among the tallest and most long-limbed peoples in the world are the Nilotic peoples, such as the Dinkas, who live in the hot, dry areas of East Africa. At the opposite extreme in body shape are the Inuits, or Eskimo, who have compact bodies and relatively short arms and legs” (Diamond, 1994, para.20). Diamond is suggesting that the body shapes of these two groups of people from different continents are impacted by their environment and that has to do with heat loss. The group that lives in a “hot and dry areas of East Africa” (Diamond, 1994, para.20), their body adjust themselves in order to have larger members that will make them sweat more and keep their body temperature cooler, while on the other hand Inuits and Eskimos live in a much cooler environment so their body compacted in order to prevent heat loss and keep them hot in their environment. Diamond suggests in his article that “human traits [evolves] by natural selection” (Diamond, 1994, para.17) to help them survive in their habitat. As an example to support his idea, he mentions the fact that people from the tropical parts of the world evolved in order to protect themselves from malaria. It is said in the article that some individuals from these areas have a mutation in their sickle-cell gene which makes “the red blood cells of people with that mutation […] assume a sickle shape” (Diamond, 1994, para.17), while people from northern Europe does not have that gene, because malaria does not exist in these parts of the world. Diamond’s ideas support what we learned in class. One’s “race” cannot be distinguished by physical traits, because the human body adapts itself to its environment for survival reasons. This means that physical traits such as the pigmentation, length, strength, etc areimpacted by the environment regardless the individual’s “race” so it becomes more difficult to associate people with a specific “race”. 

To come to a conclusion, the Anthropology class, and Diamond’s article helped me understand better that a “race” does not have a specific trait. Groups of individuals of a certain “race” have physical traits in common mostly because of their environment and continue evolving in order to adapt their body to it. This phenomenon is called natural selection. Therefore, we cannot say that a certain trait belongs to a certain “race”. So should we continue using the term race to indicate and separate groups of people?

About the author