Reply to: Collaborative course January-May 2016
My students are being asked to write 2 posts on gender (one analyzing a sexist ad, another critically reviewing an article that deals with masculinity in some way). They will also be asked to do 2 comments. The instructions have already been distributed, so I can't tell them specifically to comment on work done by your students, but I can strongly encourage it. Comment dates are February 19 and April 8. The class is a World Views at Marianopolis and there are 2 sections.
Reply to: PETA sexist advertising
Hi! Interesting post, but there seems to be an issue with the hyperlink. Hopefully this one will help your readers find the images they're looking for: http://www.thefrisky.com/2015-01-28/peta-made-me-do-it-the-7-types-of-se...
Reply to: Do Violent Video Games Promote Violence?
Very interesting post. I enjoy video games quite abit as well and peronally I do not see any correlation with killing a computer animated character and killing an actual human being. As you said the sample size of 10 cases versus 1.2 billion gamers is pretty ridiculous and Fox should not consider that a correlation.There are way more factors to consider which have a stronger correlation with murderous behaviours other than video games some of which include upbringing, social class, mental state etc. Video games do not teach you how to actually kill a person. You are just pressing buttons with your fingers, not literally taking a gun and shooting it. I could start ranting about gun laws all day which is an issue extremely more sever than video games. Had the killer in question not been able to get their hands on these weapons in the first place and the murders probably would have never occurred, but that is a different story in it's own right.
The only part that struck me as odd was when you mention that all gamers don't necessarily play violent video games because the main correlation in question had to do with murderers and violent video games so I think that if they video game is not violent it shouldn't really be relevant to this scenario. Besides that job well done!
Reply to: Insta-Fake, The Unnatainable Perfection That Haunts Our Lives
This is a great topic that definitely needs recognition from everyone that engages with social media. The issue with social media networks like Instagram is very similar to the emergence of Hollywood and film, in which unattainable body appearances seems to be one of the most significant ramifications. Whereas film only portrays high beauty ideals, Instagram and powerful celebrities (like the Kardashians) advocate not only impossible beauty standards, but as well as ridiculous materialistic possessions. In turn, this does contribute to narcissism and insecurity among youth and others on Instagram. Also, I like how you recognized the reality of Instagram posing as a mask for people that are too insecure about how their lives really are. In other words, Instagram allows people to hide behind a facade of alcohol, designer bags and material gains.
This was truly a great post, but as for further improvements, I would definitely recommend that you focus on other celebrities and other portrayals (instead of beauty ideals). For instance, if you touched on Dan Bilzerian and his depiction of masculinity on Instagram. In addition, I found it to be quite unclear as to what ethical framework you chose… Other than that, most definitely a great paper, very relevant in today’s internet-driven society.
Reply to: A scientific method of killing the patients- euthanasia
This was a pretty interesting analysis of the concrete ethical dilemma of euthanasia and applied a good assessment of the ethical theories. However, many things could have been improved. To start, the title could have been catchier. It also doesn’t link at all to the subject matter (there is absolutely no discussion of any “scientific method” in your post and you are just discussing the ethical problems). The question “is it morally correct to kill a human being?” is also extremely vague and doesn’t directly address the issue. You could have instead asked, “Is mercy killing justified as a means to impede suffering?” or something of that nature to specify what you will be talking about/arguing. In addition, I also think that virtue ethics could have been applied, or at least mentioned, in the post, especially considering those neutral instances in which both the deontological and teleological perspectives can’t apply (as you mention in your concluding sentence). In sum, it just felt rushed and I felt like more could have been discussed. There were also numerous grammatical and formatting errors (i.e. It’s not the euthanasia, it’s simply euthanasia), and the vocabulary and wording is quite redundant.
Reply to: A Prince who steals your instagram photos
Nice title, however its missing some capitalization. It should read "A Prince Who Steals Your Instagram Photos".
I like the topic you have chosen, art can be very complicating therefore I commend you for tackling it. Clean introductory paragraph however, there seem to be a couple of run-on sentences that either should be compressed or split in half. For example "This issue has recently been brought to light within social media when a man by the name of Richard Prince appropriated other peoples Instagram photos, without their knowledge or consent, blew up the images onto to portraits and then with minimal editing (nothing was done except the addition of a sentence to look like he had ‘commented’ on the photograph), he sold these images for upwards of 90’000 dollars. " In addition, I believe that you have overused the word appropriate in order say steal. In your title, you have the word steal, yet you choose not to utilize it. Variety within a text is good, you should be a little more careful of overusing specific words. In the second paragraph except for some grammatical errors such as capitalization and the colloquialization. Also, its sort of unclear which overall point you are trying to make within this paragraph. Third paragraph is a run-on sentence again. You need to split it into three phrases. You are missing a $ as well. In the following paragraph of teleology, for harm I believe you could've talked about the possible emotion harm done to those whose photos were stolen. i.e. Their intellectual property was breached. The first sentence of the next paragraph is a bit awkward. Overall, good arguments and a sweet topic Watch out for grammatical errors and run-on sentences.
Reply to: Boobs, Booties and Sluts: Female Sexism in Rap Music
Yes, yes, YES! The topic of this article is so unbelievably relevant and cannot be discussed enough. I love that you backed up the information with good evidence, and especially that you included such OUTRAGEOUS song lyrics... I love Snoop, but seeing his lyrics actually written down makes me question if I'm a terrible person for doing so.
However (yes, there's unfortunately a shitty bit... sorry!), the only thing I want to address is the fact that you say that to "limit the objectification of women in music is also immoral in of itself" because "Disallowing the degradation of women in one’s music would infringe upon their freedom of expression and creativity"… The thing is, putting in place boundaries and limiting the degradation of women isn’t the problem—it’s the fact of demanding for there to be any boundaries at all that poses a problem in regard to freedom of expression and artistic license. Nevertheless, there is seemingly more and more opposition to the misogynistic and demeaning portrayal of women in rap music (yay!). Beyoncé, Nicki Minaj, Rihanna, Azealia Banks and Iggy Azalea are but a few fierce females that are taking the rap game by storm, and are beginning to counter the problem of women being portrayed as sexual objects, and nothing but—so do not despair. Overall, great post!
Reply to: Who Said Being A Celebrity Was All Glam?
you iz my role model fam
Reply to: The Problem with Prisons in a Teleological System
This is a very interesting topic choice! Indeed today, there is a big debate on the treatment of inmates. I agree with your point of view that prisoners should not be severely punish but rather rehabilitated in order to give a chance to change and become better human beings once they return to the community. Many of the prisoners come from low income families and did not receive much care or attention from others. There is a strong link between low education and crime activity; more-educated people are less likely become criminals. According to Canada’s correctional service, 64% have not completed their high school diploma (Stevens). Moreover, I would argue, in a deontological perspective that society has a duty to educate people. Prisoners should be given the opportunity to be re-educated in becoming better citizen. Also through education, society is meant to set an example to the people. By inflicting harm, the prisoners become more and more violent. The contrast you made between the United States and Norway, demonstrates the reason for Scandinavia countries to be the world’s role models. Like Norway, Sweden policies on prisoner rehabilitation allows inmates to be “regarded as people with needs, to be assisted and helped” (James). As a result Sweden had “reoffending rates at about 40% – less than half of those in the UK and most other European countries” (James).
Stevens, Dennis J. “FORUM on Corrections Research”. Correctional Service Canada. N.d. Web. 19 June 2015.
James, Erwin. ‘Prison is not for punishment in Sweden. We get people into better shape’. The Guardian. 26 November 2014. Web. 19 June 2015
Reply to: Thinspo, Fitspo, Whatever It Is It's FAUX
very catchy title!
the subject was interesting, very relevant in todays society and important for people to be more educated about.
as the need to become extremely fit can be just as damaging as previous needs to be thin.
the Harper & Tiggmann study you wrote about was very interesting, you also bring to light a lot of the hypocritical nature seen within the new trend of 'fitspo' as well as the negative after effects it can have on people, it was very interesting as you can now make more of a link as these images leaning more towards the causation of these problems.
however, one thing which could be worked on is the generalizations, i found many times i would read a sentence with a generalization, for example when you wrote, "the media still wants women and girls to aspire to something unrealistic and possible harmful." without sources to back it up. also bias came through in the absolute way your sentences were structured, (such as saying the people with thigh gaps have unrealistic body standards), and that all the fitspo posts are simply masquerading as thinspo. (which in many cases is true but not all) when many people have natural thigh gaps and are still at a healthy weight because of the way their bones are structured. what you said in most cases is correct it would just be good to mention quickly that these are not universal rules, and that a lot of these ads promote negative body images but some are also just trying to promote health.
- 1 of 3
- suivant ›