User Login

Posts

Displaying 1 - 4 of 4
The article “Counterpoint: Prostitution Should Remain Illegal.”, by Richard Renneboog and Lee Tunstall, state that prostitution should not be legalized, by providing arguments from both sides of the issue. To begin their article, the authors present a debate over how the sex market because a part of our society. On one side, some people argue that prostitution is an “innate behaviour” or a “survival instinct” of primate societies who traded sexual favours in exchange for food and a secure social position (Renneboog & Tunstall 3). In this case, “modern societies must consider that it will never be possible to eliminate or control prostitution completely” with an act of legislation (Renneboog & Tunstall 3). The other side argues that prostitution is a choice made by mature women to “willingly pursue an independent, entrepreneurial lifestyle for which she accepts certain risks” and gives up certain social benefits (Renneboog & Tunstall 3). The main argument, in favor of legalization, provided by Renneboog and Tunstall in their article, is that 90 percent of women who are prostitutes would try to escape from prostitution if they could, but because of different circumstances, it is the only way they can provide money to their families. They work under extremely hard conditions and the legalization would “allow standards to be established and monitored, activity to be controlled, and proceeds to be taxed” (Renneboog & Tunstall 3). Renneboog and Tunstall use other countries, where prostitution has been legalized, as example to support their idea that it should remain illegal. In countries where it has been legalized, the situation went out of control; there is an increase in the involvement of criminal organizations, an increase in drug addiction and in human trafficking. People tend to believe that legalization “protects prostitutes from being brutalized by the legal system, pimps, and clients and from the dangers associated with prostitution” but experience has disapproved it (Renneboog & Tunstall 3). One of the main moral claims against legalization of prostitution is that “legalization decriminalizes all aspects of prostitution and treats it, in principle, the same as other service industries” (Renneboog & Tunstall 3). On one side, I agree that prostitutes should have the right to a safe and healthy workplace, even if it is not considered a legal job; it’s still their way of gaining money. On the other side, I agree with the authors of this article that it will simply increase sex trafficking and place women in even more vulnerable situations. I also believe by “approving” this job, it makes it look as if it was a proper thing to do and more people would decide to become, or stay, prostitutes, instead of looking for a better way to make money. The authors view prostitution as a “complex issue with many basic causal factors that cannot be addressed by any single approach including legalization”; how can it be addressed? Reference: Renneboog, Richard, Tunstall, Lee. “Counterpoint: Prostitution Should Remain Illegal.” Canadian Points of View: Prostitution (2014): n. Pag. Web. 04 Feb. 2014.

704 | 1 | 0
As we all know, in today’s society, professional sport teams take up a big place in our cities. It is the perfect source of excitement, adrenaline and amusement, but do we really know what these athletes go through every day? These players constantly have to train and work hard to bring to the minimum their chance of getting injured. The injury the most talked about is the concussion. But what is a concussion?

1,281 | 2 | 0
The article entitled “Canada’s spy agency faces tough questioning over snooping” by Jordan Press of Postmedia News, explains how Canada’s secret spy agency (Communications Security Establishment Canada) has been allegedly spying and tracking Canadians through open Wi-Fi networks in airports. The article explores how the agency would analyze data such the duration of phone calls, the location of calls and phone numbers involved in these calls.

806 | 2 | 0
Hi everyone, here is a post about if United-States should support Israel in its war against Palestine and terrorism. Summary of the article -In the article ‘’Point: The US Should Support an Israeli State in the Middle East’’ the author Micah Issitt argues that United-State should support Israel in the name of global security and the war against terrorism. The authors starts with a historical background of the conflict between Palestine and Israel and then finish with the advantages of supporting Israel in its war against Palestine.

552 | 1 | 0

Lucien's Classes

User is not a member of any group.

Lucien's Institutions

User is not a member of any group.